SECTION 1
BASIC PROPERTIES AND DATA MANAGEMENT
Naturally occurring rocks are in general permeated with
fluid – water, oil, or gas or combinations of these fluids. Oil and
gas operators are concerned with the quantities of fluid contained
within the rocks and the transmissibility of the fluids through the
rocks. The following discussion of fundamental rock properties, fluid
saturations and reservoir drive mechanisms will provide background
necessary to understand how these properties affect water production in
oil and gas wells.
This section
also includes a brief discussion on collection and organization of well
information and production data. This includes useful plots to assist in
analyzing water production and methods to track different costs related
to water handling.
Rock Properties.
Porosity
is defined as the ratio of the void space in a rock to the
bulk volume of that rock multiplied by 100 to express in percent. It is
also referred to as the storage capacity of underground formations.
Porosity can be classified according to the mode of origin as 1)
original (primary) – developed during deposition of the sediment or 2)
induced (secondary) – developed by some geologic process subsequent to
the deposition of the rock. Original porosity is typified by the
intergranular porosity of sandstones, carbonates, and the interparticle
and oolitic porosity of some limestones. Induced porosity is typified by
fracture development as found in some shales and limestones or by vugs
or solution cavities commonly found in limestones or by dissolution of
feldspar in a sandstone. Rocks having original porosity are more uniform
in their characteristics than those rocks in which a large part of the
porosity is induced. Porosity can be further defined as total or
effective. Total porosity is the ratio of the total void space in the
rock to the bulk volume of the rock; effective porosity is the ratio of
the interconnected void space in the rock to the bulk volume of the
rock, each expressed in percent.
Permeability
is a measure of the capacity of the rock medium to transmit or
conduct fluids. It is measured in field units of darcys or millidarcys.
Flow paths are of varying shapes and sizes and are randomly connected.
Fluid flow occurs both horizontally and vertically. Most porous rocks
will have spatial variations in permeability. Matrix permeability refers
to the flow in primary pore spaces in a rock as opposed to fracture
permeability that refers to the flow in cracks or breaks in the rock. In
some sand and carbonate reservoirs the formation frequently contains
solution channels and natural or artificial fractures. These channels
and fractures do not change the permeability of the matrix but do change
the effective permeability of the flow network.
Fluid Saturation.
In most oil bearing formations
it is believed that the rock was completely saturated with water prior
to the invasion and trapping of petroleum.1 The less dense
hydrocarbons migrate to positions of hydrostatic and dynamic
equilibrium, thus displacing water from the interstices of the
structurally high part of the rock. The oil will not displace all the
water. Thus, reservoir rocks normally contain both petroleum
hydrocarbons and water (frequently referred to as connate water)
occupying the same or adjacent pores. To determine the quantity of
hydrocarbons accumulated in a porous rock formation, it is necessary to
determine the fluid saturation (oil, water, and gas) of the rock
material. The simultaneous existence of two or more fluids in porous
rock requires that terms such as capillary pressure, relative
permeability, and wettability be defined.
Capillary pressure
is the pressure
required to drive a fluid through a pore throat and displace the
pore-wetting fluid. As pore
throats become smaller, higher capillary pressures are required to
displace the pore-wetting fluid.2 Capillary pressure curves
are available that provide information regarding pore throat sorting,
relative permeabilities, and reservoir quality. The size of the pore
throat is related to the residual water saturation. Water cut is related
to the capillarity and the distance above the oil-water contact.
Capillarity is important to waterflood performance.
Relative permeability
is the ratio of the effective permeability of a particular
fluid to a base permeability of the rock. Since it is both a rock
property and a fluid property, relative permeability is a difficult
concept to understand. The permeability of a rock depends upon the type
of fluid that is flowing, characteristics of the rock surface and the
pore structure geometry. The presence of more than one fluid at the same
time in the pore space of a rock also affects the permeability. Relative
permeabilities range from zero to one, and are a function of the fluid
saturation.
Wettability.
When two immiscible fluids such as oil and water are together
in contact with a rock surface, one of the fluids will preferentially
adhere to the rock surface. Wettability refers to a measure of which
fluid preferentially adheres to the surface. Most producing reservoirs
generally exist in a water-wet state, in which the
connate water preferentially adheres to the rock surfaces. If the
contact angle from the rock surface through the water is < 90o,
the rock surface is said to be water wet. On the other hand, if the
contact angle is > 90o, the rock is said to be oil wet.
Wettability has an influence on the interstitial water saturation,
residual oil saturation, capillary pressure, relative permeability, and
waterflood performance.
Reservoir Drive Mechanisms.
Several sources of energy exist in the formation. In the case
of liquid petroleum, the natural energy is the expansive energy of the
liquid petroleum and the gas dissolved in the liquid petroleum at the
elevated pressure at which the petroleum is confined. In addition to the
expansive energy of the petroleum hydrocarbons, all petroleum
accumulations are associated with water. The oil accumulation may be
surrounded by water-bearing formations. This water is subjected to
elevated pressures in the subsurface. Upon withdrawal of the fluid from
the petroleum reservoir, the reservoir becomes a pressure sink; the
contiguous water flows into the petroleum reservoir, displacing oil or
gas toward the wellbores. In addition to expansive energies, there is
also the force of gravity acting at all times to promote segregation of
the various fluids. Gas tends to occupy the higher places in the
accumulation; oil, being denser than gas and less dense than water,
tends to occupy the intermediate position; and water tends to underlie
the petroleum. Frequently, oil fields are found in which a part of the
reservoir is liquid saturated and a part is gas saturated. This type of
accumulation is referred to as an oil reservoir with a gas cap.
Solution-gas or depletion drive
is a petroleum reservoir with no original free gas cap and no
associated active water; the principal energy is the expansion and
dissociation of gas in solution in the
oil. Water production is generally minimal. The
solution-gas drive is characterized by a rapid pressure decline and low
recovery efficiency.
Solution-gas-gas-cap drive
is a petroleum reservoir containing an original free gas cap
with no associated active water. Reservoir pressure is maintained at
higher levels in most instances (if the gas cap is not prematurely
depleted), thus improving recovery efficiency. The degree of improvement
depends on the size of the gas cap relative to the oil zone and on the
production procedure used. As with solution-gas drive, water production
is generally minimal.
Water drive
is a petroleum reservoir associated with water-bearing
formations that are so active that little or no pressure drop occurs
when hydrocarbon fluids are withdrawn. Water drive is the most efficient
in maintaining reservoir pressure and usually yields the highest
recovery efficiency. Water production
varies significantly depending on structural position and nature of the
water drive.
Collecting and Organizing Well and/or Production Data.
Wells are basically the source of all information concerning
the reservoir. Formation evaluation data must be obtained during
particular phases of the drilling and completion of a well, since
certain types of
data are not obtainable later. Reservoir
fluid and production data are typically obtained after the wells are
completed; consequently the operator has more latitude in taking such
data.
Wellbore schematics
are an excellent way of concisely capturing and displaying
well data. When relevant well and reservoir data are properly analyzed,
the results can help to explain both production
performance and reservoir performance. The importance of keeping good
individual well records of all production
and injection data as well as workover information cannot be
over-emphasized. It is not enough to know production rate for the entire
lease or field. A test on each production well at least once or twice a
month is generally sufficient to identify individual well rates.
Graphical plots
of data are visual displays that assist the operator in
defining specific occurrences during the life of a well. Plots provide
insight to individual well and overall project performance. Interaction
between wells can also be observed. The plots can be done by hand, with
common spreadsheet software, or using specific oil and gas software. A
major advantage of using the computer for data storage is the speed with
which data can be updated and displayed graphically. The operator can
quickly and easily access the same data to prepare
plots for an entire project, individual wells, groups of wells,
patterns, or other study areas.
Oil production versus time.
Plots of oil production will help the operator observe and
better understand occurrences during the life of a well. A semi-log plot
of oil production versus time is commonly referred to as a decline
curve. Logarithm of oil production rate is the ordinate (or y axis) and
time, using a linear scale, is the abscissa (or x axis). This type of
plot reveals changes in oil production and
is used to determine information such as 1) the time at which
production rate will reach its economic limit by extrapolating
production decline trends, 2) the time at
which oil rate reaches a peak, and 3) the time
of initial production response from water injection.
Rates versus time.
Plots of various rates versus time can assist in determining
specific occurrences associated with a producing well. These rates
include water production, water-oil ratios (watercut), gas-oil ratios,
water injection rates, and cumulative water injection. It is common to
plot different rates versus time on the same graph. Such comparisons can
assist in determining a relationship between different variables, such
as injection and production rates in a waterflood. Fluctuations in one
rate can have an effect on another.
Water-oil ratio (WOR) versus cumulative oil
production.
A semi-log plot of WOR versus cumulative oil production
is also informative in
recognizing occurrences during the life of a well. Logarithm of
WOR is the ordinate and linear cumulative oil production is the
abscissa. This type of plot reveals changes in water production as a
function of oil production. Economic limits
can be shown easily and because the area under the curve
represents total water production, everything necessary to track a well
is clearly shown. Sharp increases in WOR can indicate a problem, such as
a casing leak or water breakthrough in a water-drive reservoir or
waterflood. High WOR associated with low cumulative oil production can
indicate a channeling problem. This type of plot should be done for the
project and for individual wells. When properly constructed, these plots
are also useful in predicting the ultimate recovery at a known
WOR. If increased WOR occurs early in the life of a well or is
associated with low cumulative oil production, a review of individual
well data, geological description, and engineering data is warranted to
define appropriate remedial work, such as permeability modification
using gelled polymers. Successful remediation can
result in a reversal of the WOR curve, followed by a flattening of the
curve. This type of work can reduce lifting costs by decreasing the
amount of water production, increasing the sweep efficiency and
extending the economic life of the project or well.
Hall plots
are most often used to analyze
injection wells, but they can also be used to analyze fluid injection
treatments in producing wells. They provide information on fill-up, skin
damage, formation fracturing, and water channeling. Required data are
cumulative injection volume and injection pressure. The summation of the
surface or bottomhole pressure multiplied by time is plotted versus the
cumulative fluid injected on coordinate paper. Changes in the slope of
the plotted line indicate a change in
resistivity associated with fluid injection in the reservoir.
Knowing Your Water-related Costs.
Water production can make or break a project’s performance
by reducing the flow rate or ultimate recovery or by raising costs. The
cost of lifting, separating, handling and disposing of this water is
substantial. In addition to the economic burden, water can also directly
reduce hydrocarbon production. Water plays a
role throughout the entire life cycle of a well.
A listing of direct costs and impact areas is given in Table 1.3
Table 1. Water-related Cost and Impact Areas
|
1.
Accounting in estimate of economical recoverable reserves
|
|
2. Water
use strategies in drilling program
|
|
3. Water
control strategies in completion design
|
|
4. Water
control conformance strategies in the reservoir and the wellbore
|
|
5. Water
drive and choke strategies
|
|
6. Water
lifting and surface handling
|
|
7. Chemical
treatment
|
|
8. Water
gathering and water process facilities
|
|
9. Permitting
and delays
|
|
10. Transportation
|
|
11. Injection disposal and waterflood
|
|
12. Beneficial use
|
|
13. Liabilities
|
Rudolph,
J. and Miller, J., “Downhole Produced Water Disposal Improves Gas
Rate,” GRI October 2001 publication.
Many companies don’t recognize or account for the
full cost of water management since accounting is often spread over many
corporate departments. Consequently, the impact of water is
underestimated and opportunities to implement strategies and improve
inefficiencies are overlooked.
Ironically, smaller companies (independent producers) are in a better
position to recognize the cross-functional costs and implications,
but they tend to lack the resources to identify and implement
effective water management strategies. These costs and impacts impose an
enormous burden on the industry’s ultimate return on investment and
reduce economically recoverable reserves. In many cases
a modest gain in economic efficiencies can lead to a
substantially large economic benefit.
|